Advice on how to dispute and defend against parking charge notices and claims from the unregulated private parking companies and their shady debt recovery agents.
This website, dedicated to assisting motorists who have become the victims of parking charges issued by private parking companies (PPCs). A majority of victims of these "scammer" PPCs are duped into thinking that these are "fines". They are not. They are speculative invoices for alleged debts for breaching the terms of a contract. The PPCs are more often than not, companies that have been set up by ex-clampers and other scammers who used to operate on or even outside the margins of the law.
This website will be a free resource to enable the victims of these rogue companies to fight back against the thuggish PPCs who are totally unregulated.
With thanks to the MoneySavingExpert.com parking forum regulars who dedicate huge amounts of their own time helping the victims of these predatory PPCs.
PAP link1 Plan A PPCoP PoFA compliance Enforcement Tactics POPLA Plan C Draft content More draft Forum
Have you or anyone you know been stung with a parking charge notice from a private parking company? Do you or did you think it was a "fine"? Was it expected or a surprise?
Alternate intro...
Introduction
The UK's private parking industry has long been accused of engaging in predatory practices, with MPs from across Parliament referring to them as "scammers," "cowboys," "ex-clampers," and other derogatory names. The industry's unregulated nature has led to a rise in robo-claims and credit clamping, with companies abusing the court system to extort money from unsuspecting drivers. This article will discuss the issues surrounding the unregulated private parking industry and the need for a government-introduced Private Parking Code of Practice (PPCoP) to protect the public.
Unregulated Industry: A Breeding Ground for Unfair Practices
The private parking industry in the UK operates without statutory regulation, allowing companies to set their own rules, charges, and enforcement methods without oversight. This has led to numerous complaints about unfair practices, including excessive charges, unclear signage, and aggressive enforcement tactics.
The lack of mandatory industry standards exacerbates the problem. While some companies have voluntarily joined trade associations like the British Parking Association (BPA) or the International Parking Community (IPC), these associations, themselves unregulated, do not enforce mandatory rules or regulations.
The Predatory Nature of Private Parking Companies
The unregulated environment has resulted in a proliferation of PPCs, many of which are small, unprofessional and run by ex-clamper rogues. These companies often target vulnerable or elderly drivers with misleading advertising or signage and use intimidation tactics and threatening legal action to enforce their charges.
Currently, PPCs issue approximately 35,000 parking tickets daily, employing a system of misleading signage, opaque appeals services, aggressive debt collection, and unreasonable fees to extort money from motorists. Steve Gooding, Director of the RAC Foundation, highlighted the booming private parking sector, stating that "if only the rest of the economy was booming like the private parking sector, perhaps we'd all be feeling more prosperous."
Government's Response and the Introduction of the Private Parking Code of Practice
Despite numerous complaints and calls for regulation, the government has been slow to act. However, the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) published a statutory Code of Practice in February 2022, aiming to address the rogue parking industry's malpractices. The industry has filed Judicial Reviews and delayed the new Code of Practice, but the government is moving forward with a final Public Consultation and Impact Assessment later this year (2023).
Conclusion
The unregulated private parking industry in the UK has caused significant issues due to unfair practices and predatory behaviour. The introduction of the government's Private Parking Code of Practice is a crucial step toward protecting drivers from unscrupulous parking companies. Until its implementation, drivers should exercise caution when using private car parks and be aware of their rights when challenging unfair charges or enforcement actions.
Private parking charge notices (PCNs) can be a frustrating experience for drivers and registered keepers (RK) who receive them. These notices are issued by private companies when a driver has allegedly breached the terms and conditions in a privately owned car park, such as overstaying or not paying for parking.
If you receive a private parking charge notice, there are several things you should consider before taking any action. Firstly, it's important to check the validity of the charge and whether the company issuing it is a member of a professional trade association, such as the British Parking Association (BPA) or the International Parking Community (IPC). If they are, they must follow a code of practice and provide clear information on how to challenge the charge.
It's also important to gather as much evidence as possible, such as photos of the signage at the car park, any receipts or tickets and any correspondence with the parking company. This will help you to build a case if you decide to challenge the charge.
When considering what to do next, it's important to understand that private parking charge notices are not the same as fines issued by the police or local authorities. They are essentially invoices for breaching the terms of the parking contract. However, if you ignore the notice, the parking company may take legal action against you, which could result in further costs and potentially a court case.
If you decide to challenge the charge, there are several options available such as appealing to the parking company, using an independent appeals service, or taking legal action. It's important to carefully consider which option is right for you.
Here at ParkingCon, our aim is to assist as many as possible of the victims of these cowboy, ex-clamper scammers to fight back and put a dent in their profits. As has already been mentioned, this is already a billion pound industry that thrives on the publics ignorance of the law surrounding private parking.
Far too many victims of the parking ticket scam are either gullible or vulnerable. These ex-clamping thugs are exploiting the fact that the industry is unregulated and they are free to run amok using all means at their disposal including the court system.
Almost every private parking company that uses the courts to try and enforce their scams use a small group of solictors firms who a notorious for their robo-claim methods and flirting at the very edge of the law when it comes to bringing court action. We will name and shame these companies as we go along.
Before we get there, if you have received a private parking charge, please read on...
When a private parking company (PPC) issues a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) through the post, they will initially send it to the registered keeper (RK) of the vehicle. This is because the PPC obtains the details of the RK from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) based on the RK details listed in the V5C registration document.
It is important to note that under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA 2012), a PPC can only hold the RK liable for a parking charge if certain conditions are met. These include providing a compliant Notice to Keeper (NTK) within a specified timeframe and following other procedural requirements. If the PPC does not comply with these conditions, they cannot hold the RK liable for the parking charge and there is no obligation for the RK to provide the details of the driver. Unless the drivers identity has been revealed inadvertently, usually because the RK contacts the PPC and say things like "I parked..." or "I drove to...". In law, the "driver" and the "RK" are two separate entities.
The old advice about ignoring PCNs is many years out of date. If you receive a PCN as the RK of the vehicle, it is important to take action and respond to the notice. This can include appealing the PCN on various grounds, such as procedural errors, lack of signage, or unclear terms and conditions.
It is important to note that if you were not the driver of the vehicle at the time of the alleged parking violation, as the RK, you should only transfer liability to the driver if the PCN is definitely PoFA 2012 compliant. However, you should still not reveal the driver's identity in the initial appeal, as this may give the PPC an opportunity to transfer liability to the RK.
In summary, when a private parking company issues a PCN, they will initially send it to the registered keeper of the vehicle based on the RK details listed in the V5C registration document. If you receive a PCN as the RK, it is important to respond to the notice and consider appealing the PCN. When appealing the PCN, you should not reveal the identity of the driver in the initial appeal, as this may give the PPC an opportunity to transfer liability to them instead.
There is a difference between receiving a PCN as a windscreen ticket and one that is sent to you by post because of an ANPR camera. A ticket or PCN that is stuck to the windscreen is known as a Notice to Driver (NtD). This is because the operative who issues the ticket assumes that the person who discovers the ticket will be the driver of the car. However, they do not know the identity of the driver. It matters not whether they have seen the driver for themselves or not. They still don't know the "identity" which is the name and address of that person. They do not have access to the DVLA drivers licence details and they don't have some magic database with the photo identity of every driver in the UK.
If an NtD was stuck to the windscreen and the driver has not appealed or contacted the PPC within 28 days, they should then send by post a PCN otherwise known as a Notice to Keeper (NtK). The "keeper" or registered keeper (RK) is the person whose details are registered on the cars logbook, the V5C. The PPC can request those details, only once, from the DVLA if the PPC is a member of an Accredited Trade Organisation (ATA) which is approved by the DVLA.
There are only two ATAs for PPCs and neither is regulated. They are the British Parking Association (BPA) or the International Parking Community (IPC). Both of these ATAs are very incestuous because their boards are made up with directors from their own member PPCs. Both of these ATAs have their own, supposedly, Independent Appeals Service (IAS). The BPA has the Parking on Private Land Appeals Service (POPLA) and the IPC have the Independent Appeals Service (IAS). Neither of these services are independent as they are owned and operated by the ATAs themselves. This should always be kept in mind if or when using their appeals services.
If you really want a truly independent arbiter, you would need to have a judge decide for you whether you have been charged lawfully or not. The only way you would get to have a judge decide would be if the PPC decided to take you to court. As mentioned in the "Four plans..." article, Plan D is the one that is the most likely to get you out of the clutches of the PPCs demands for money.
Free AI Website Maker